Study that fuelled fear of genetically modified foods retracted

French professor Gilles-Eric Seralini gives a press conference on November 28, 2013 at EU headquarters in Brussels to denounce the removal by the Food and Chemical Toxicology review of his study published in September 2012 on the effects of genetically-modified maize fed to rats.


 Gilles-Eric Seralini at a media conference on November 28, 2013 at EU headquarters in Brussels to denounce retraction of his study on the effects of feeding genetically-modified maize to rats.PHOTO: JOHN THYS/AFP/GETTY IMAGES
Story Published: November 28, 2013

An arresting but widely criticized study that stoked fears about genetically modified foods (GMOs) was retracted Thursday.

The move was met with relief by scientists who heaped scorn on  the French study after  it was published last year. The study claimed a steady diet of genetically modified corn caused tumours in rats.

But observers say the damage will be hard to undo.

The retraction is “good news,” says biologist Robert Wager, at Vancouver Island University, who objected to the study from the outset. But he says “it’s worrisome it took over a year for the journal to do the right thing.”

He predicts Gilles-Eric Seralini, of the University of Caen who led the study, will now be viewed as a martyr by believers in the dangers of GM crops and food. “The power of pseudo-science to generate fear must not be underestimated,” Wager said in a statement. “Once instilled, facts rarely dissipate that fear.”

The French study, published in journal Food and Chemical Toxicology, made headlines around the world a year ago. It claimed to have found evidence that rats fed a diet of Monsanto’s genetically modified corn, or given water containing Roundup at levels permitted in the United States died earlier than those on a standard diet. It also said  rats on the GM diet suffered from tumours, as well as severe liver and kidney damage.

Seralini,  a long-time critic of genetically engineered crops, also released gruesome photos of bulging tumours that were featured prominently in  British tabloids in stories about the study and the dangers of  “Frankenfoods.”

Many scientists criticized  the Seralini’s evidence and methods and called for the record to be set straight. One of the major flaws in the study is that Seralini used rats that are highly susceptible to tumours, with or without GMOs in their diets, they said.

The editor of Food and Chemical Toxicology sent Seralini a letter earlier this month saying the paper would be retracted if he did not agree to withdraw it.

The journal delivered Thursday. It said an “in-depth look at the raw data revealed that no definitive conclusions can be reached” from the small sample of rats Seralini studied.  The known high incidence of tumours in the strain of lab rats studied” cannot be excluded as the cause of the higher mortality and incidence observed in the treated groups,” it added.

Cami Ryan, at the University of Saskatchewan, notes that the study has been discredited by food and feed safety agencies all over the world. “Retraction seemed inevitable,” she said Thursday.

David Spiegelhalter at the University of Cambridge in the U.K. said “it was clear from even a superficial reading that this paper was not fit for publication, and in this instance the peer review process did not work properly.”

“I suppose it is better late than never,” Spiegelhalter said. “Sadly the withdrawal of this paper will not generate the publicity garnered by its initial publication.”

Seralini and his team remain unrepentant, and allege that the retraction derives from the journal’s editorial appointment of biologist Richard Goodman, who previously worked for biotechnology giant Monsanto for seven years.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s